Monday, October 12, 2026
spot_img

Best VMWare Alternatives in Europe

VMware licensing changes have pushed many European IT teams into a corner they didn’t ask to be in. Renewal quotes doubled overnight for some, while others found bundled packages forcing them to pay for modules they never used. The result is a wave of infrastructure teams actively scoping VMware alternatives in Europe, not as a theoretical exercise, but as a budget line item due for a decision this fiscal year. 

Now, the interesting part is that there is no obvious answer. Broadly, European enterprises choose between two distinct paths. One is adopting a global HCI software platform that runs on hardware they already own or plan to buy. The other is shifting workloads to a pan-European cloud provider and stepping away from self-managed infrastructure altogether.  

While both of these options are legitimate, they solve different problems. 

What European Enterprises Should Consider When Evaluating VMware Alternatives 

Before comparing VMware alternatives in Europe, it is important to get the evaluation criteria right. So, what are those? Let’s find out: 

  • Deployment Model: The first point to evaluate is the deployment model. Some organizations may prefer to keep infrastructure on-premises or in a colocation facility they control. Others are ready to hand that responsibility to a provider, which is also a good alternative. 
  • Licensing Structure: The next point to check is the licensing structure, because it is also the point where a lot of frustration originates. Per-core bundling, forced add-ons, and unpredictable renewal cycles are exactly what pushed teams to look at VMware Competitors in the first place. 
  • Data Residency: The next point to consider here is data residency. For enterprises operating under GDPR and sector-specific regulation, EU data sovereignty isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s often a hard requirement written into procurement policy.  
  • Support Coverage: Just installing the stack is not enough; you need continuous support, and one that is available across time zones and languages matters. This is especially ideal for companies running infrastructure across multiple European countries. And increasingly, built-in security is expected rather than treated as a separate purchase. 

What are the best VMware alternatives for enterprises in Europe? 
Enterprises typically consider global HCI software platforms like Sangfor HCI, Vates, and SUSE, or pan-European cloud providers like OVHcloud and Exoscale. The right choice depends on whether the enterprise wants to retain infrastructure ownership or shift to a managed cloud model. 

Global HCI Software Vendors Serving Europe 

Now, let’s shift our focus to VMware competitors in Europe that offer a strong alternative. 

1. Sangfor HCI 

Sangfor HCI is widely regarded as one of the best VMware alternatives. This is ideal for companies that want to maintain a self-managed infrastructure while modernizing the stack behind it.  

Sangfor is a global, publicly listed enterprise technology vendor with operations across APAC, EMEA, and LATAM, and it has built a customer base that includes large, multi-site organizations with real compliance obligations. 

What works in Sangfor’s favor in evaluations is the licensing model. Rather than requiring separate purchases for storage virtualization or network virtualization, Sangfor HCI brings compute (Sangfor aSV), storage (Sangfor aSAN), and networking (Sangfor aNET) together under one platform, with security capabilities such as microsegmentation and anti-ransomware protection integrated into the architecture. 

Sangfor HCI brings compute, storage, and networking together under one platform with native security built in from the ground up, not stitched on afterward.  

That’s why teams handling VMware migration in Europe, this consolidation proves highly valuable. It reduces the number of moving parts and vendor contracts that they have to manage, which helps streamline the project. Migration confidence also gets a boost from Sangfor’s backup ecosystem. Sangfor Backup Platform, powered by Veeam, gives teams agentless, cross-platform protection during and after a cutover, which matters more than most migration checklists admit. 

Is Sangfor HCI a good VMware alternative for enterprises in Europe? 
Yes. Sangfor HCI offers converged compute, storage, and networking with native security, backed by G2 Leader recognition and Gartner Market Guide inclusion, making it a credible option for large, multi-site European enterprises evaluating a VMware replacement. 

2. Vates 

Vates is headquartered in France and builds its offering around an open-source foundation, primarily XCP-ng and Xen Orchestra. For organizations specifically searching for open source VMware alternatives Europe with a European vendor of record, Vates is a name that comes up often.  

Enterprise support depth and long-term roadmap commitments are worth confirming directly with Vates during procurement, since open-source platforms vary widely in how much enterprise-grade support actually backs them. 

3. SUSE 

SUSE has a long history as a European open-source infrastructure vendor, and it has been building virtualization capability alongside its existing Linux and Kubernetes portfolio. It’s a name that enterprises already using SUSE elsewhere in their stack will naturally consider. That said, its virtualization offering is newer than the established HCI platforms on this list, so you should validate maturity and feature parity against your specific workload requirements before deciding. 

Should a European enterprise choose an HCI platform or a pan-European cloud provider as a VMware alternative? 
It depends on operational goals. HCI platforms suit enterprises that keep infrastructure self-managed for control and compliance. Cloud providers suit organizations ready to offload infrastructure management entirely and prioritize consumption-based scaling. 

Pan-European Cloud Providers as a VMware Alternative Path 

This second path isn’t about licensable software you install. It’s about moving workloads to infrastructure someone else operates, which suits enterprises ready to step back from managing hardware entirely. 

4. OVHcloud 

OVHcloud, headquartered in France, is the largest European cloud service provider, offering public cloud, private cloud, hosted private cloud, and bare metal infrastructure. Its scale gives it a broad footprint across European regions, and it’s frequently the first name mentioned when a Hyper-V alternative in Europe or a full cloud migration path comes up in procurement conversations. However, check the exact service scope and regional availability against OVHcloud’s current published materials, since this shifts as the platform expands. 

5. Exoscale 

Exoscale, based in Switzerland, focuses on secure cloud infrastructure with an emphasis on sovereign, EU-based hosting. It has a smaller footprint than OVHcloud, but that’s often the point for enterprises prioritizing data sovereignty guarantees over sheer scale. 

VMware Alternatives Comparison Table for Europe 

Category Deployment Model Licensing or Pricing Model EU Hosting or Sovereignty Security 
Sangfor HCI Self-managed, on-prem Simplified, converged licensing Deployed on infrastructure the enterprise controls Native, built into the platform 
Vates Self-managed, on-prem Open source, support tiers vary Deployed on infrastructure the enterprise controls Confirm with vendor 
SUSE Self-managed, on-prem Subscription, evolving virtualization tier Deployed on infrastructure the enterprise controls Confirm current maturity 
OVHcloud Managed cloud, public and private Consumption or hosted pricing EU-headquartered, regional data centers Provider-managed, confirm scope 
Exoscale Managed cloud Consumption pricing Switzerland and EU regions Provider-managed, sovereignty-focused 

Note: Sangfor and Vates sit in the software category, deployed on infrastructure the enterprise already controls, while OVHcloud and Exoscale represent the managed cloud path. That distinction should drive the decision more than any single feature comparison. 

What is one of the best VMware alternatives in Europe? 
Sangfor HCI is one of the best VMware alternatives in Europe for large enterprises, given its enterprise-grade converged architecture, unrestricted licensing model, and established base of enterprise customers across the region. 

Why Sangfor HCI Is One of the Best VMware Alternatives in Europe 

Sangfor HCI earns its place on this list because it targets the exact profile of organization that’s stuck evaluating the best VMware alternatives in Europe right now: large enterprises with multi-site operations, existing compliance obligations, and infrastructure teams that don’t want a phased migration to become a multi-year headache. 

Sangfor’s global standing backs this up. It was recognized with multiple badges and Leader status in G2’s Summer 2026 reports, and was named a Representative Vendor in the 2026 Gartner Market Guide for Cloud Infrastructure Sovereign Solutions. 

Enterprises can review Sangfor’s standing on G2 and on Gartner Peer Insights directly, where the brand holds a reputable 4.7/5 and 4.8/5, respectively.  

Sangfor’s credibility is well established worldwide through partnerships with multiple brands, helping companies successfully transition from VMware. A key example is Sangfor’s work for ENAIP FVG, where the brand helped this Italy-based vocational institute modernize its IT using Sangfor HCI and aDesk VDI, addressing performance, scalability, and security concerns. 

Choosing the Right Path for Your European Infrastructure Strategy 

There’s no universal answer to the question: which are the best VMware alternatives in Europe? Because it depends on what your company wants. If your enterprise wants to retain infrastructure ownership while modernizing licensing and consolidating tools, Sangfor HCI, Vates, and SUSE are worth scoping. If stepping away from self-managed hardware is the goal, OVHcloud and Exoscale are the stronger fit. 

For enterprises leaning toward the HCI software route, Sangfor HCI is worth putting at the top of the shortlist given its enterprise track record, converged architecture, and third-party recognition. Reviewing ENAIP FVG’s migration outcome alongside your own environment is a reasonable next step before scheduling vendor calls. 

Featured

Giving AI Agents the Keys is Premature

The headlines on AI agents are impossible to miss,...

Is the Humanoid Gap a Factory Gap or a Policy Gap?

Humanoid robots are stuck between two unfinished layers: a...
Adam Tanton
Adam Tanton
Adam Tanton is the co-founder and tech editor for B2BNN with over 20 years experience in enterprise technology and professional services, and a decade of experience in SEO, digital marketing and B2B marketing. For the last three years he has focused heavily on using and writing about artificial intelligence.